Exploring the drivers of co-occurring multiple non-native fish assemblages within an invaded and flow-modified African river system
- Authors: Mpopetsi, Pule Peter
- Date: 2023-10-13
- Subjects: Freshwater ecology , Invasion biology , Freshwater fishes South Africa Great Fish River Estuary , Functional trait , Functional diversity , Introduced fishes South Africa Great Fish River Estuary , Food chains (Ecology)
- Language: English
- Type: Academic theses , Doctoral theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/431871 , vital:72810 , DOI 10.21504/10962/431871
- Description: Globally, there is growing concern on the negative impacts of species invasions and habitat disturbance because these have been shown to have the potential to disrupt native community structure and function. In some instances, these two stressors can occur in concert, such as in river systems associated with inter-basin water transfer (IBWT) schemes. The Great Fish River in the Eastern Cape, South Africa, is an example of a system affected by both habitat modification and multiple fish invasions largely because of an IBWT scheme. The opening of the Orange-Fish IBWT, which transfers water from the Orange River to the Great Fish River, modified the latter’s natural flow regime from irregular seasonal to perennial. In addition, the IBWT facilitated translocations of five fish species from the Gariep Dam (Orange River system) into the Great Fish River system. Proliferation of these non-native fish species, along with that of other fish species introduced for angling and biological control, raise questions on the mechanisms facilitating their existence within this highly modified river system. This thesis explored mechanisms associated with co-occurrences of these multiple non-native fishes within the Great Fish River. A comparison of historical and contemporary records on the ichthyofauna of the Great Fish River revealed that, of the 11 non-native fishes reported in this system, seven have established successfully, three have failed to establish and the status of one was uncertain. The Orange-Fish IBWT and angling were the main vectors of these invasions, accounting for 36% and 46%, respectively. The study also found that most established non-native fish species were large sized, had high longevity and wide habitat tolerance. Trait-based approaches were employed to investigate the role of functional diversity of non-native and native fishes in relation to their composition, distribution and environmental relationships. Although considerable interspecific variation in body morphology-related functional traits among species were observed, there was no clear distinction in these traits between native and non-native fish assemblages on a trait-ordination space. Furthermore, there were weak species-trait-environment relationships, suggesting that environmental filtering was less plausible in explaining the occurrence patterns of these fishes. Stable isotope-based trophic relationships were evaluated in three invaded sections: the upper (UGFR) mainstem sections of the Great Fish River; and lower (LGFR) mainstem sections of the Great Fish River; and its tributary, the Koonap River. It was observed that native and non-native fish assemblages exhibited variation in isotopic diversity typified by low isotopic diversity overlaps in UGFR and Koonap River, whereas the LGFR was characterised by high isotopic diversity overlap. Within the invaded sections, non-native fishes were found to have isotopic niches characterised by variable isotopic niche sizes and were more isotopically dissimilar with propensity towards trophic differentiation within the UGFR and Koonap River but were mostly characterised by high isotope niche overlaps in the LGFR. Overall, these results provided evidence of trophic niche differentiation as a probable mechanism associated with the co-occurrences of the non-native fishes. However, mechanisms facilitating these co-occurrences within the invaded sections appears to be complex, context-specific and, in some cases, unclear. Lastly, machine learning techniques, boosted (BRT) and multivariate (MRT) regression trees, revealed that the flow-disturbed habitats were invaded by multiple non-native species, whereas the non-disturbed headwaters remained invasion free. In addition, non-native species were predicted to co-occur with native species within the mainstem and large tributary sections of the Great Fish River system. Thus, the IBWT-disturbed mainstem sections were predicted to be more prone to multiple invasions compared to undisturbed headwater tributaries. , Tlhaselo ka mefuta ya diphoofolo-tsa-matswantle (non-native species), ha mmoho le phetolo/tsenyehelo ya bodulo ba diphoofolo-tsa-lehae (native species), di nkuwa ele tse pedi tsa tse kgolo ka ho fetisisa hara ditshoso tse kgahlanong le paballo kapa tshireletso ya diphoofolo-tsa-lehae tse phelang dinokeng kapa metsing. Maemong a mang, dikgatello tsena tse pedi dika etsahala ka nako e le nngwe, jwalo ka dinokeng tseo di amanang le maano a ho fetisa/tsamaisa metsi pakeng tsa dinoka tse fapa-fapaneng (IBWT). Enngwe ya dinoka tse jwalo, ke noka e bitswang ka Great Fish River, e fumanehang Kapa-Botjabela (Eastern Cape) ka hara naha ya Afrika Borwa (South Africa). Noka ena ya Great Fish River e angwa ke tshenyehelo ya bodulo ba ditlhapi-tsa-lehae, ha mmoho le tlhaselo ya tsona ka ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle. Tsena di etsahala hahololo ka lebaka la morero kapa leano la phepelo ya metsi le bitswang Orange-Fish IBWT, leo lona le ileng la fetola phallo ya tlhaho ya metsi a Great Fish River. Ho feta moo, leano lena la phephelo yametsi, Orange-Fish IBWT, le entse hore ho be bonolo ho fetisetswa ha mefuta e mehlano ya ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle ho tloha letamong le bitswang Gariep Dam, hoya kena ka hara noka ya Great Fish River. Ditla morao tsa tsena tsohle, ebile ho ata ha mefuta e mengata ya ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle ka hara noka ya Great Fish River. Ho ata hona ha ditlapi-tsa-matswantle ka hara noka ena ya Great Fish River, ho hlahisa dipotso mabapi le mekgwa e bebofatsang ho phela ha ditlhapi tsena tsa matswantle ka hara noka ena; hore ana ebe diphela jwang ka hara noka ya Great Fish River? Ka hona, sepheo le merero wa thuto ena ke ho phuputsa mekgwa e bebofatsang ho phela ha mefuta ena e fapaneng ya ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle ka hara noka ya Great Fish River. Dipheto tsa diphuputso di hlalosa hore, ha jwale, ka hara noka ena ya Great Fish River, hona le ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle tse leshome le motso o mong (11). Bosupa (7) ba tsona di phela ka katleho, ha tse tharo di hlolehile ho theha (3), mme e le nngwe (1) boemo ba teng ha bo hlake. Hare lekola hore ke efeng mekgwa e amanang le ho ata ha ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle ka hara Great Fish River, re fumana hore leano la phephelo ya metsi la Orange-Fish IBWT ka 36%, ha mmoho le boithapollo ba ho tshwasa ditlhapi (angling) ka 46%, ene ele tsona tsela tsa ho kena ha ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle ka hara Great Fish River, tse ka sehlohong. Re fumantsha hape hore katleho ya ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle e amahangwa le hore di boholo bo bokae, le hore diphela nako e ka kang. Mohlala, ditlhapi tse kgolo tse phelang nako etelele ka tlhaho ya tsona, di amahangwa le katleho ya ho theha ka hara noka ena. Ha tseo tse phelang nako e kgutshwanyane tsona disa amahangwe leho atleha ka hara noka ena. Tse ding tsa dipheto di hlalosa hore, ditlhapi-tsa-lehae le ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle, ka karolelano, hadi fapane haholo ka dibopeho tsa mmele, dihlopa tsena tse pedi diya tshwana. Re fumantsha hape hore dihlopa tsena tse pedi tsa ditlapi dija mefuta e fapaneng ya dijo. Eleng engwe ya dintho tse netefatsang katleho ya ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle ka hara noka ena ya Great fish river. Hona keka lebaka la hore, dihlopa tsena tse pedi hadi bakisane dijo, empa di phela ka mefuta e fapaneng ya dijo. Hare phethela, re fumantsha hore mefuta e fapafapaneng ya ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle e fumaneha feela ka hara madulo a amahangwang le phethoho ya phallo ya metsi (flow alteration), madulo asa amahangwang le phetoho ya phallo ya metsi ona ane a hloka ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle. Sena se bolela hore phetolo ya phallo ya metsi ya Great Fish River, ka lebaka la Orange-Fish IBWT, e fokoditse matla a noka ena ho lwantsha tlhaselo ya ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle. Ka hona, ho bobebe hore ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle di thehe ka katleho ka hara noka ena. Tsena tsohle keka baka la phetolo ya phallo ya metsi a Great Fish River e bakilweng ke leano la phephelo ya metsi la Orange-Fish IBWT. , Thesis (PhD) -- Faculty of Science, Faculty of Science, Ichthyology and Fisheries Science, 2023
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2023-10-13
- Authors: Mpopetsi, Pule Peter
- Date: 2023-10-13
- Subjects: Freshwater ecology , Invasion biology , Freshwater fishes South Africa Great Fish River Estuary , Functional trait , Functional diversity , Introduced fishes South Africa Great Fish River Estuary , Food chains (Ecology)
- Language: English
- Type: Academic theses , Doctoral theses , text
- Identifier: http://hdl.handle.net/10962/431871 , vital:72810 , DOI 10.21504/10962/431871
- Description: Globally, there is growing concern on the negative impacts of species invasions and habitat disturbance because these have been shown to have the potential to disrupt native community structure and function. In some instances, these two stressors can occur in concert, such as in river systems associated with inter-basin water transfer (IBWT) schemes. The Great Fish River in the Eastern Cape, South Africa, is an example of a system affected by both habitat modification and multiple fish invasions largely because of an IBWT scheme. The opening of the Orange-Fish IBWT, which transfers water from the Orange River to the Great Fish River, modified the latter’s natural flow regime from irregular seasonal to perennial. In addition, the IBWT facilitated translocations of five fish species from the Gariep Dam (Orange River system) into the Great Fish River system. Proliferation of these non-native fish species, along with that of other fish species introduced for angling and biological control, raise questions on the mechanisms facilitating their existence within this highly modified river system. This thesis explored mechanisms associated with co-occurrences of these multiple non-native fishes within the Great Fish River. A comparison of historical and contemporary records on the ichthyofauna of the Great Fish River revealed that, of the 11 non-native fishes reported in this system, seven have established successfully, three have failed to establish and the status of one was uncertain. The Orange-Fish IBWT and angling were the main vectors of these invasions, accounting for 36% and 46%, respectively. The study also found that most established non-native fish species were large sized, had high longevity and wide habitat tolerance. Trait-based approaches were employed to investigate the role of functional diversity of non-native and native fishes in relation to their composition, distribution and environmental relationships. Although considerable interspecific variation in body morphology-related functional traits among species were observed, there was no clear distinction in these traits between native and non-native fish assemblages on a trait-ordination space. Furthermore, there were weak species-trait-environment relationships, suggesting that environmental filtering was less plausible in explaining the occurrence patterns of these fishes. Stable isotope-based trophic relationships were evaluated in three invaded sections: the upper (UGFR) mainstem sections of the Great Fish River; and lower (LGFR) mainstem sections of the Great Fish River; and its tributary, the Koonap River. It was observed that native and non-native fish assemblages exhibited variation in isotopic diversity typified by low isotopic diversity overlaps in UGFR and Koonap River, whereas the LGFR was characterised by high isotopic diversity overlap. Within the invaded sections, non-native fishes were found to have isotopic niches characterised by variable isotopic niche sizes and were more isotopically dissimilar with propensity towards trophic differentiation within the UGFR and Koonap River but were mostly characterised by high isotope niche overlaps in the LGFR. Overall, these results provided evidence of trophic niche differentiation as a probable mechanism associated with the co-occurrences of the non-native fishes. However, mechanisms facilitating these co-occurrences within the invaded sections appears to be complex, context-specific and, in some cases, unclear. Lastly, machine learning techniques, boosted (BRT) and multivariate (MRT) regression trees, revealed that the flow-disturbed habitats were invaded by multiple non-native species, whereas the non-disturbed headwaters remained invasion free. In addition, non-native species were predicted to co-occur with native species within the mainstem and large tributary sections of the Great Fish River system. Thus, the IBWT-disturbed mainstem sections were predicted to be more prone to multiple invasions compared to undisturbed headwater tributaries. , Tlhaselo ka mefuta ya diphoofolo-tsa-matswantle (non-native species), ha mmoho le phetolo/tsenyehelo ya bodulo ba diphoofolo-tsa-lehae (native species), di nkuwa ele tse pedi tsa tse kgolo ka ho fetisisa hara ditshoso tse kgahlanong le paballo kapa tshireletso ya diphoofolo-tsa-lehae tse phelang dinokeng kapa metsing. Maemong a mang, dikgatello tsena tse pedi dika etsahala ka nako e le nngwe, jwalo ka dinokeng tseo di amanang le maano a ho fetisa/tsamaisa metsi pakeng tsa dinoka tse fapa-fapaneng (IBWT). Enngwe ya dinoka tse jwalo, ke noka e bitswang ka Great Fish River, e fumanehang Kapa-Botjabela (Eastern Cape) ka hara naha ya Afrika Borwa (South Africa). Noka ena ya Great Fish River e angwa ke tshenyehelo ya bodulo ba ditlhapi-tsa-lehae, ha mmoho le tlhaselo ya tsona ka ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle. Tsena di etsahala hahololo ka lebaka la morero kapa leano la phepelo ya metsi le bitswang Orange-Fish IBWT, leo lona le ileng la fetola phallo ya tlhaho ya metsi a Great Fish River. Ho feta moo, leano lena la phephelo yametsi, Orange-Fish IBWT, le entse hore ho be bonolo ho fetisetswa ha mefuta e mehlano ya ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle ho tloha letamong le bitswang Gariep Dam, hoya kena ka hara noka ya Great Fish River. Ditla morao tsa tsena tsohle, ebile ho ata ha mefuta e mengata ya ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle ka hara noka ya Great Fish River. Ho ata hona ha ditlapi-tsa-matswantle ka hara noka ena ya Great Fish River, ho hlahisa dipotso mabapi le mekgwa e bebofatsang ho phela ha ditlhapi tsena tsa matswantle ka hara noka ena; hore ana ebe diphela jwang ka hara noka ya Great Fish River? Ka hona, sepheo le merero wa thuto ena ke ho phuputsa mekgwa e bebofatsang ho phela ha mefuta ena e fapaneng ya ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle ka hara noka ya Great Fish River. Dipheto tsa diphuputso di hlalosa hore, ha jwale, ka hara noka ena ya Great Fish River, hona le ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle tse leshome le motso o mong (11). Bosupa (7) ba tsona di phela ka katleho, ha tse tharo di hlolehile ho theha (3), mme e le nngwe (1) boemo ba teng ha bo hlake. Hare lekola hore ke efeng mekgwa e amanang le ho ata ha ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle ka hara Great Fish River, re fumana hore leano la phephelo ya metsi la Orange-Fish IBWT ka 36%, ha mmoho le boithapollo ba ho tshwasa ditlhapi (angling) ka 46%, ene ele tsona tsela tsa ho kena ha ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle ka hara Great Fish River, tse ka sehlohong. Re fumantsha hape hore katleho ya ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle e amahangwa le hore di boholo bo bokae, le hore diphela nako e ka kang. Mohlala, ditlhapi tse kgolo tse phelang nako etelele ka tlhaho ya tsona, di amahangwa le katleho ya ho theha ka hara noka ena. Ha tseo tse phelang nako e kgutshwanyane tsona disa amahangwe leho atleha ka hara noka ena. Tse ding tsa dipheto di hlalosa hore, ditlhapi-tsa-lehae le ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle, ka karolelano, hadi fapane haholo ka dibopeho tsa mmele, dihlopa tsena tse pedi diya tshwana. Re fumantsha hape hore dihlopa tsena tse pedi tsa ditlapi dija mefuta e fapaneng ya dijo. Eleng engwe ya dintho tse netefatsang katleho ya ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle ka hara noka ena ya Great fish river. Hona keka lebaka la hore, dihlopa tsena tse pedi hadi bakisane dijo, empa di phela ka mefuta e fapaneng ya dijo. Hare phethela, re fumantsha hore mefuta e fapafapaneng ya ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle e fumaneha feela ka hara madulo a amahangwang le phethoho ya phallo ya metsi (flow alteration), madulo asa amahangwang le phetoho ya phallo ya metsi ona ane a hloka ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle. Sena se bolela hore phetolo ya phallo ya metsi ya Great Fish River, ka lebaka la Orange-Fish IBWT, e fokoditse matla a noka ena ho lwantsha tlhaselo ya ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle. Ka hona, ho bobebe hore ditlhapi-tsa-matswantle di thehe ka katleho ka hara noka ena. Tsena tsohle keka baka la phetolo ya phallo ya metsi a Great Fish River e bakilweng ke leano la phephelo ya metsi la Orange-Fish IBWT. , Thesis (PhD) -- Faculty of Science, Faculty of Science, Ichthyology and Fisheries Science, 2023
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 2023-10-13
Colonisation theory and invasive biota : the Great Fish river, a case history
- Authors: Laurenson, Lawrie Jon Bain
- Date: 1986
- Subjects: Biological invasions -- South Africa -- Great Fish River , Clarias gariepinus , Barbus aeneus , Freshwater ecology
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: vital:5338 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1005905 , Biological invasions -- South Africa -- Great Fish River , Clarias gariepinus , Barbus aeneus , Freshwater ecology
- Description: Colonisation theory relative to introduced populations was examined with a view to determining the usefulness of theoretical concepts in the prediction of the success of an invasion by a species. To this end, the Great Fish River, with reference to species introduced by the Orange/Fish Tunnel, was used as a case history. It was concluded that theoretical descriptions of population growth, control and decline are useful only when considering individual ecosystems or species. The highly variable nature of species and environments nullifies attempts to simplify behavioural characteristics into a predictive framework. There is an abundance of terminology associated with introduced organisms and frequently many of these terms are used synonymously. Eleven terms have been defined in this thesis with a view to standardising terminology. Characteristics of species and environments which enhance their susceptibility to invasions by exotic ichthyofauna were discussed and summarised. Distribution data concerning exotic fish introduced into the Great Fish River by the Orange/Fish Tunnel has demonstrated that, with the exception of Clarias gariepinus, all remaining exotics have restricted distributions. Only Barbus aeneus appears to be extending its range down the drainage. Age, Growth, reproduction and condition data support the conclusion that, excluding B. aeneus and C. gariepinus, invasive species in the drainage are not performing well. Of the five invasive species (B. aeneus, Labeo capensis, L. umbratus, Gephyroglanis sclateri and Cyprinus carpio), only two have established populations (B. aeneus· and C. gariepinus). Labeo umbratus and C. carpio were present on the Great Fish River prior to the construction of the tunnel and populations of the species could not be distinguished. It was concluded that there is no evidence to suggest that exotic species introduced into the Great Fish River are having a deleterious effect on indigenous, endangered ichthyofauna. Monitoring of the drainage should be continued to ensure that a danger to indigenous species does not develop.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 1986
- Authors: Laurenson, Lawrie Jon Bain
- Date: 1986
- Subjects: Biological invasions -- South Africa -- Great Fish River , Clarias gariepinus , Barbus aeneus , Freshwater ecology
- Language: English
- Type: Thesis , Masters , MSc
- Identifier: vital:5338 , http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1005905 , Biological invasions -- South Africa -- Great Fish River , Clarias gariepinus , Barbus aeneus , Freshwater ecology
- Description: Colonisation theory relative to introduced populations was examined with a view to determining the usefulness of theoretical concepts in the prediction of the success of an invasion by a species. To this end, the Great Fish River, with reference to species introduced by the Orange/Fish Tunnel, was used as a case history. It was concluded that theoretical descriptions of population growth, control and decline are useful only when considering individual ecosystems or species. The highly variable nature of species and environments nullifies attempts to simplify behavioural characteristics into a predictive framework. There is an abundance of terminology associated with introduced organisms and frequently many of these terms are used synonymously. Eleven terms have been defined in this thesis with a view to standardising terminology. Characteristics of species and environments which enhance their susceptibility to invasions by exotic ichthyofauna were discussed and summarised. Distribution data concerning exotic fish introduced into the Great Fish River by the Orange/Fish Tunnel has demonstrated that, with the exception of Clarias gariepinus, all remaining exotics have restricted distributions. Only Barbus aeneus appears to be extending its range down the drainage. Age, Growth, reproduction and condition data support the conclusion that, excluding B. aeneus and C. gariepinus, invasive species in the drainage are not performing well. Of the five invasive species (B. aeneus, Labeo capensis, L. umbratus, Gephyroglanis sclateri and Cyprinus carpio), only two have established populations (B. aeneus· and C. gariepinus). Labeo umbratus and C. carpio were present on the Great Fish River prior to the construction of the tunnel and populations of the species could not be distinguished. It was concluded that there is no evidence to suggest that exotic species introduced into the Great Fish River are having a deleterious effect on indigenous, endangered ichthyofauna. Monitoring of the drainage should be continued to ensure that a danger to indigenous species does not develop.
- Full Text:
- Date Issued: 1986
- «
- ‹
- 1
- ›
- »